Is Gravitational Interaction Affected by Different Shapes of Bodies?

AI Thread Summary
Gravitational interaction between bodies of different shapes cannot be simplified by assuming mass is concentrated at their centers, as this assumption only holds true for bodies with spherical symmetry. The discussion highlights that while Gauss's theorem applies to spherical bodies, it does not extend to all shapes. A counterexample demonstrates that the gravitational force calculated based on center of mass assumptions can yield incorrect results for non-symmetrical configurations. The interaction between bodies can vary significantly depending on their shapes and arrangements. Therefore, accurate gravitational calculations require considering the entire volume of each body rather than treating them as point masses.
paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
I wonder about gravitational interaction between two bodies of any shape (not necessarly symmetrical).
I would like to predict the motion of their centers of mas if they don't interact with any other bodies. Can I assume that mass of each body is located only in the center and compute the gravitational force as if the bodies were punctual? (In fact I should compute double vector integral over volume of each body.)

I know that it's true in case of bodies with spherical symmetry (one can prove this using e.g. Gauss theorem). Is it always true for all shapes of bodies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
paweld said:
Can I assume that mass of each body is located only in the center and compute the gravitational force as if the bodies were punctual?
No.
I know that it's true in case of bodies with spherical symmetry (one can prove this using e.g. Gauss theorem). Is it always true for all shapes of bodies.
No, it's not true in general.
 
Thanks.

I've just devised a simple counterexample.
Consider three points of equal masses m lying on the line in the distance a from each other.
One body consists of two points lying side by side and other of one point. The real interaction between bodies is up to multiplicative constant 1/a^2 +1/(2a)^2 while according to my assumption about the center of masses it would be 2/(3/2 a)^2.
 
Good!
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top