Is hands-on experience necessary for design engineers to be successful?

  • Thread starter Thread starter F.ono
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design
AI Thread Summary
Hands-on experience is viewed as valuable for design engineers, with many expressing that it enhances their understanding and effectiveness in their roles. Some engineers feel a lack of fulfillment when they are not involved in the assembly or maintenance of their designs, suggesting that direct engagement with the equipment can deepen their expertise. Others highlight the benefits of having a mix of field and office work, noting that each has its own pressures and rewards. There is a consensus that gaining practical experience, whether through field service or personal projects, can significantly improve a designer's capabilities. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of balancing design work with hands-on experience to foster professional growth.
F.ono
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I have been an electrical design engineer for 3 years now and although I like what I do, sometimes I feel like there's something lacking about the job.
I mean that I hardly get my hands dirty by actually assemblying or giving maintenance to the equipment that I design. I know that there are people whose work is to do these tasks, but still...
On the other hand I often have oportunities to see the test and commissioning of the equipment, which is cool.
Does any design engineer here feel like less of an engineer because of this "problem"?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I can only describe my own experience. I was an EE in the early days of NASA and I designed, built, tested, and deployed digital logic circuit for both ground stations and on-board rocket telemetry. I would have felt VERY cheated had I not been able to do all of those things. When one-off items were used enough we did have them fabricated by contractors but I was fine w/ that since I had shepherded the prototypes all the way through, and most of the circuits were just one-off.

It's unfortunate that you don't get to do more, but your company probably figures its more cost effective to have something of an "assembly line" process.
 
The grass is always greener...

I was a "hands on" field engineer in a plant maintenance department.
I often envied the design guys with their nice offices and weekends off.
Many of them said they envied my "more interesting real world" work environment.I tried a stint at office work. The pressures are no less, just different.
I went back to field work.

Different strokes for different folks.

interesting coincidence here - I just had a not unrelated conversation with pf'er dlgoff...
A young engineer might benefit greatly from a tour of duty in field service. Does your company have such a branch?
Inquire of some really old, experienced guys where you work, and see what your boss thinks.

old jim
 
I mean that I hardly get my hands dirty by actually assemblying or giving maintenance to the equipment that I design. I know that there are people whose work is to do these tasks, but still...

Get a project as a hobby?
 
I had a job for a long time where myself or a team would conceive of something, analyze and design it, have it fabricated (usually under our supervision and even participation), inspect the final product, have it shipped to our plants, then come out, install and start it up (followed by years of maintaining it). It is really helpful to have the full experience. In my view it would make you a better designer. It may not be the most efficient method for all companies. In our case we were experts in a specific area, and we did everything to support it.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top