A Metal or Insulator: Examining Resistance in Multiple Directions

howl
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Generally, a material is metal or insulator is simply determined by the gap. But if we view it in another way, to measure the resistance in different direction, says x and y, and there are usually different. And then measure the resistance change with temperature. Usually, the resistances goes up with temperature increases is metal, while resistances goes down is insulator, or semiconductor. If one finds that a material in x direction looks like metal in this resistance experimental, while in y no, is this situation possible? If so, could we say this material is metal just in x direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
howl said:
Generally, a material is metal or insulator is simply determined by the gap. But if we view it in another way, to measure the resistance in different direction, says x and y, and there are usually different. And then measure the resistance change with temperature. Usually, the resistances goes up with temperature increases is metal, while resistances goes down is insulator, or semiconductor. If one finds that a material in x direction looks like metal in this resistance experimental, while in y no, is this situation possible? If so, could we say this material is metal just in x direction?
We use such material in laminated core transformers. The metal laminations are separated by non-conducting varnish. This is used to limit eddy current losses in the core:

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-99d6364e32355e6c00ab138131eeb3c5

main-qimg-99d6364e32355e6c00ab138131eeb3c5.gif
 

Attachments

  • main-qimg-99d6364e32355e6c00ab138131eeb3c5.gif
    main-qimg-99d6364e32355e6c00ab138131eeb3c5.gif
    15.2 KB · Views: 593
  • Like
Likes aaroman and CWatters
howl said:
Generally, a material is metal or insulator is simply determined by the gap. But if we view it in another way, to measure the resistance in different direction, says x and y, and there are usually different. And then measure the resistance change with temperature. Usually, the resistances goes up with temperature increases is metal, while resistances goes down is insulator, or semiconductor. If one finds that a material in x direction looks like metal in this resistance experimental, while in y no, is this situation possible? If so, could we say this material is metal just in x direction?

The cuprate superconductors are made up of layers of different atoms and molecules.

HTS_crystal_structures.jpg


Along the so-called [a,b] plane where the Cu-O planes lie, it is very conducting, almost like a typical metal. Along the c-axis (vertical direction), the resistivity can be several orders of magnitude higher, and often considered to be insulating.

There are many layered materials that behave this way, so it isn't that exotic anymore.

Zz.
 

Attachments

  • HTS_crystal_structures.jpg
    HTS_crystal_structures.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 797
  • Like
Likes aaroman and NathanaelNolk
As far as I know graphite is such a material. Its resistivity is much higher in the c direction than in the a-b plane. I do not know about its metallicity though.
 
Thanks for your answers!
I know that there is anisotropy in many materials, what I want to know is when temperature goes up, resistance in x increases, while y no, is it usual?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top