Is it possible to find an isomorphism between two groups with a new operation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TorKjellsson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Isomorphism
TorKjellsson
Messages
8
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let (G,\cdot) be a group. Defining the new operation * such that a*b = b \cdot a it is pretty easy to show that (G,*) is a group. Show that this new group is isomorphic to the old one.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have been experimenting with the possibility to define an isomorphism \phi (a*b) = b a but can't really seem to get it right. Can anyone give me a hint on how to find the isomorphism?


Tor
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Will the conjugate action work?
 
Hm, actually after doing some more exercises I figured out a function that works. I am not quite sure of what you mean by conjugate action but I post my solution here:

Let \phi: (G,*) \rightarrow (G, \cdot) such that \phi (a) = a^{-1}. Then \phi(a) \phi(b) = a^{-1} b^{-1}. Consider now \phi(a*b) = (ba)^{-1} = a^{-1} b^{-1} and we see that \phi(a) \phi(b) = \phi(a*b).
 
Ooo nice. I was thinking of something like a --> ga(g-1). But that doesn't work.
 
This group is called the opposite group. It is important for studying the relation between left- and right- group actions. Just thought I'd throw that fun fact in there.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top