Is L'Hopital's Rule Applicable to Natural Log Limits?

MrBailey
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi all.
I'm slightly confused with the following limit prob:
\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac{(ln (x))^n}{x}
which I know = 0. (n is a positive integer)
It looks like it's of indeterminate form, that is
\frac{\infty}{\infty}
Using L'Hopital's, it looks like you get another indeterminate form:
\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac{n(ln (x))^{n-1}}{x}
...and so on and so on.
Is it correct to assume that, applying L'Hopital's n times, you'll eventually get:
\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac{n\cdot (n-1)\cdot (n-2) \cdot ... \cdot 1}{x}
which is equal to zero?
Thanks,
Bailey
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I edited the above...hopefully it looks clearer.

Isn't the derivative of the natural log 1/x
and you keep on doing it "n" times...so you always end up with an "x" in the denominator when applying L'Hopital's rule...until you get 1/x with all of the "n" terms in the numerator.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Bailey
 
yes that's right. chain rule. no matter what positive integer n, in the end you will have some fixed number in the numerator but the denominator goes to infinity so it wins out and the limit will be zero.
 
Thanks...I wanted to make sure I was on the right track.

Best wishes,
bailey
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top