Is Mass Irrelevant in This Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether mass is necessary to solve a physics problem involving an automobile sliding to a stop. Participants clarify that mass is not needed because the kinematic equations can be solved without it, focusing instead on the coefficient of kinetic friction. An example is provided, comparing a toy car and a real car to illustrate that mass does not affect the stopping time in this scenario. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using general symbolic representations in physics problems rather than getting bogged down in numerical calculations. Ultimately, the conclusion is that mass is irrelevant for determining the stopping time in this case.
Arwing
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
An automobile's wheels are locked as it slides to a stop from 34.9 m/s. If the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.266 and the road is horizontal, how long does it take the car to stop?
Relevant Equations
F=ma, Fg=mg, Fk=coefficient of friction * Fn
I'm not sure where to start, I feel like I'm missing the mass but it is not listed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe you don't need the mass. What do the kinematic equations that don't depend on mass have to say?
 
Arwing said:
Homework Statement:: An automobile's wheels are locked as it slides to a stop from 34.9 m/s. If the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.266 and the road is horizontal, how long does it take the car to stop?
Relevant Equations:: F=ma, Fg=mg, Fk=coefficient of friction * Fn

I'm not sure where to start, I feel like I'm missing the mass but it is not listed.
You don't need the mass. Go ahead and solve the equations to find the acceleration.
 
Arwing said:
Homework Statement:: An automobile's wheels are locked as it slides to a stop from 34.9 m/s. If the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.266 and the road is horizontal, how long does it take the car to stop?
Relevant Equations:: F=ma, Fg=mg, Fk=coefficient of friction * Fn

I'm not sure where to start, I feel like I'm missing the mass but it is not listed.
You could assume a) it's a toy car with a mass of ##1 kg##; and, b) a real car with a mass of ##1000 kg##; and see what difference that makes.

Which car will stop quicker? The toy or the real one?
 
This thread highlights a common bad habit among many students: trying to compute every single partial result numerically. Most of the time it will be more illuminating to make general symbolic considerations for general input parameters and only insert particular values given in the problem once a general expression for the final result has been reached.

If you think mass is relevant, then introduce a mass parameter m and see if it appears in the final result.
 
Addendum: It can be argued on dimensional grounds that the mass is necessarily irrelevant in this problem.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top