Schools Is Math Grad School Right for Me?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the decision of pursuing a PhD in mathematics versus transitioning to an engineering career for immediate financial stability. The appeal of a PhD lies in the opportunity for continued study and intellectual challenge, while the engineering path offers a lucrative salary and a more structured work-life balance. Participants emphasize the importance of personal interest and passion in making this decision, suggesting that enjoyment in one's field can significantly impact long-term satisfaction. The challenges of graduate school are acknowledged, with some noting that a genuine love for the subject is crucial for enduring the rigors of a PhD program. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards prioritizing personal interests over financial considerations when choosing a career path.
robertjordan
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
I can't decide if I want to pursue a PhD in math or not.

I like the idea because it would let me keep studying math (interesting), and the challenge would help show me what I am capable of (intellectual potential).

But I can't help but wonder if I would be happier if I changed my major to engineering and get a 70k job at age 23 with weekends off?



Any advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not really sure what you want people to tell you. We don't have any idea if you will be happier doing a PhD in Math or working as an engineer.
 
Personally, I will be opting for the PhD path because the marginal benefit of working for a PhD out weighs the marginal benefit of working as an actuary. You need to decide what you want and go for it.
 
I myself found grad school to be so difficult and tiring that I would not have lasted through it without a real love for the subject that made thinking about the material enjoyable. Even so, I hardly smiled or laughed until it was over.

I sort of question whether your attitude would carry you through this process. There is something to be said for making more money. but not all engineers I know do so. Engineers suffer from a challenge that pure math types do not, i.e. their stuff has to actually work.

I second the idea that you will probably be better off doing whatever you enjoy more and find more interesting.
 
DeadOriginal said:
Personally, I will be opting for the PhD path because the marginal benefit of working for a PhD out weighs the marginal benefit of working as an actuary. You need to decide what you want and go for it.

Can you expound?
 
Best Pokemon said:
Can you expound?

As mathwonk has already stated, you should just do what you find interests you more.

I have passed the P, FM and MFE exams but I only plan on becoming an actuary if something goes horribly wrong and I cannot go to graduate school. I love math more than the money I can make as an actuary and so, as long as I have the choice I will choose going to graduate school over going into industry after getting my bachelors.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top