Is Max Born Ignoring the Electric Field that Produces Current in his Theory?

AI Thread Summary
Max Born's "Einstein's Theory of Relativity" presents a potential contradiction regarding electric fields and currents in wires. On one page, he states that a current-carrying wire is electrically neutral and surrounded solely by a magnetic field, while earlier he attributes the current to an electric field. This raises questions about whether Born is neglecting the electric field that generates the current to emphasize the electric field created by the charge in the wire. The discussion highlights the complexity of understanding electric and magnetic fields in the context of relativity. Ultimately, the inquiry reflects a deeper exploration of how these fields interact in relativistic physics.
GregAshmore
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
I'm reading Max Born's "Einstein's Theory of Relativity", 1962 version. On page 297 he says that a wire with a current in it is electrically neutral and surrounded by only a magnetic field.

Yet on page 161 he says that current in a wire is the result of an electric field.

It would seem that the wire on page 297, with its electric current, must be in an electric field.

What am I missing?

The context on page 297 is the electrical charge which is seen by an observer moving relative to the wire. That charge produces an electric field around the wire. Is he ignoring, for the sake of discussion, the electric field which produces the current in order to focus on the electric field produced by the charge in the wire?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GregAshmore said:
Is he ignoring, for the sake of discussion, the electric field which produces the current in order to focus on the electric field produced by the charge in the wire?
Exactly.
 
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top