Is memorization bad or good in this case? Is it even necessary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Domnu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even
Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
When (self)learning quantum mechanics, I was introduced to Hermitian polynomials when learning about harmonic oscillators. This was pretty simple to remember, but then, today, when I first started reading about 3D quantum mechanics (when the Schroedinger equation has now become spherical), I am being attacked by differential equations which have *very* strange solutions... some of them include the spherical harmonics, associated Legendre functions (with Legendre polynomials), Bessel spherical functions, and Neumann spherical functions.

In a quantum mechanics undergraduate course, are such formulae provided (to avoid memorization)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When I took quantum mechanics, I did not have to know "Legendre functions (with Legendre polynomials), Bessel spherical functions, and Neumann spherical functions" too thoroughly. As I recall, I was just learning Bessel, Neumann, and Legendre functions.

The answer might depend on your learning style. I learn things from the top down. I get the big picture first, and then dig down into the finer (and more finer) details. If it were me I would just focus on the quantum mechanics and learn what ever mathematical details it required.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top