Is My Approach to Solving This Complex Physics Problem Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phunphysics2
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a complex physics problem involving vector calculations, with the original poster seeking validation for their approach. They initially questioned their angle choices and recalculated their vectors, arriving at a resultant vector that pointed to Walpole. A participant suggested a simpler method of directly adding the vectors instead of performing extensive calculations. The original poster appreciated the feedback and noted their instructor's preference for detailed work. Ultimately, they felt reassured about their answer being Walpole.
phunphysics2
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Greetings Fellow Physics adorers,

I was wondering if someone could please help me with the problem attached (I took a picture of it because it contains a complex graphic).

I would just like someone to please look at it and see if I am on the right track to solving it. I attached a picture of my work.

Any and all helps, tips, comments, suggestions are much appreciated.

Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • 2012-09-14 09.18.40-1.jpg
    2012-09-14 09.18.40-1.jpg
    33.3 KB · Views: 407
  • 2012-09-14 09.17.28-1.jpg
    2012-09-14 09.17.28-1.jpg
    20.5 KB · Views: 385
Physics news on Phys.org
ATTN: I think I caught my error.
Should I be using -45, 154, and -72 degrees instead of the ones I used above?

With those new angles, I got my x to be -16.97 and y to be -24.17 and my resultant vector to be 29.53 and my city to be WALPOLE
 
Last edited:
Why don't you simply add all the three vectors directly? There's not really a need for any such calculations.
 
Looking at it quickly, it looks like it could be Dedham.

EDIT: At a closer look, Walpole seems correct.
 
Greetings Ripe,

Thank you very much for your rapid response.


1. Our instructor likes to see all of that worked out like that.

2. Thanks for your comment about the city. I am glad you also think it is Walpole. (makes me feel better inside since I don't have the answer in the back of the book to check :smile: )
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top