Courses Is My Junior Year Course Load Too Much?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a 15-credit course load, including challenging subjects like quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics, and theoretical physics, is manageable for a junior student. Concerns are raised about the difficulty of the theoretical physics course, which the student is eager to take but fears may be overwhelming. An alternative course in medical physics is considered, but it is perceived as significantly easier. Participants emphasize that while the course load appears standard, individual circumstances such as jobs, family obligations, and personal health can greatly influence one's ability to handle it. There is a caution against underestimating the difficulty of the alternative course, as assumptions about ease can lead to unexpected challenges. The importance of pursuing courses that align with personal interests and academic goals is highlighted, suggesting that passion for a subject can motivate students to manage their workload effectively.
SJay16
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Was just wondering if this course load is too much for a junior, I’m aware everyone is different, but let’s generalize the case.
15 credits;
Quantum mechanics
Statistical mechanics
Methods of Theoretical physics
Partial differential equations w/applications
Geography elective

I am afraid that the theoretical physics course may push me over threshold of my limit, but it is my last chance to take the course and I’m extremely interesting in theoretical physics. If I switch it out, I’d be switching it for a medical physics and radiation safety class, which I’m also almost as interested in, except it’ll be much much easier.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks like a fairly standard course load to me... 4 STEM courses and an elective to round out the semester. But a lot can depend on your specific circumstances. It's one thing to do that when it's the only thing you have to concentrate on. It's another if you have to balance it with a part-time job, family obligations, health issues to deal with, etc. And you know better than we do what kind of course load you'll perform best under.

Don't psyche yourself out of taking a course that you really want to take. Sure, it might be a lot of work. But what are you at university for in the first place?

The other piece of advice is not to necessarily assume that another course is going to be "much much easier." Conceptually sure, the course material may be a lot more straight forward, but I've seen a lot of people over the years end up in a world of hurt because they've assumed that something is going to be easy and then get burned when they realize it isn't, and then they're stuck taking a tough course that they didn't even want to take in the first place.
 
  • Like
Likes SJay16
The pre-requisites for the methods of theoretical physics are Modern physics, multivariable calc, DE’s, and Intermediate classical mechanics, which I have all of , but I’m still wondering if I’m ill equipped.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top