Is My Method for Deflecting a Beam of Electrons Invalid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silverado
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Electrons
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the validity of a method for deflecting a beam of electrons, analyzing the equations of motion and forces involved. The participant derives relationships using work-energy principles and questions the placement of constants in their equations. They realize that the electron's motion follows a circular trajectory, indicating that the force acting on it is variable, which invalidates their initial method. The conversation concludes with the identification of centripetal force as the correct approach for analyzing the electron's motion. Understanding the nature of the forces involved is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
Silverado
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1.png

Homework Equations



W = -U for conservative forces
F = qV x B = qvBsinθ
W = Fd for conservative forces
K = 1/2mv^2
sinθ = 1 for 90° angles
E1 = E2 (conservation of mechanical energy)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
W = -U
-Fd = U

E1 = E2
K = U
K = -Fd = -qvBsinθd
K =-qvBd
-K/qd = Bv (1)

K = (1/2)mv^2
∴ v = sqrt(2K/m)
Substitute into (1)

-K/qd = B ⋅ sqrt(2K/m)
K^2/q^2d^2 = B^2 ⋅ (2K/m)
mK/2q^2d^2 = B^2
B = sqrt(mk/2q^2d^2)

Why is two in the denominator rather than in the numerator? Is my method invalid? If so, where can I improve? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation K=-Fd is for work done when a force advances distance d in tne direction of the force. Which way is the force here? Which way does the electron move?
 
The electron moves up and to the left in a parabolic trajectory. Therefore, there must be a force exerted up and a force exerted left which negates the electrons initial kinetic energy. How does this realization affect my derivation?
 
Silverado said:
The electron moves up and to the left in a parabolic trajectory. Therefore, there must be a force exerted up and a force exerted left which negates the electrons initial kinetic energy. How does this realization affect my derivation?
that shows the direction of the force changes over time. But the electron moves in a circular arc. Look at any part of that arc. What is the relationship there between the direction of the movement of the electron and the direction of its acceleration? What does that tell you about the direction of the force?
 
The force is variable, therefore my method is invalid. How should I approach this problem, then?
 
The motion follows a circular trajectory. What sort of force results in such a trajectory?
 
Centripetal

F = mv^2/r
 
Silverado said:
Centripetal

F = mv^2/r
Yes.
 
Back
Top