Is My Solution to This Log Question Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter elctronoob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log Logarithms
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the logarithmic equation Log3(10x – 1) – 2 = 2log3x. The original poster initially misinterprets the logarithmic properties, leading to incorrect manipulations. After several attempts and clarifications from others, they arrive at a more accurate formulation: log3(10x-1) - 2 = log3(x^2). Ultimately, they simplify it to find x values of 1 and 1/9, which are confirmed as correct by other participants. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding logarithmic rules in solving such equations.
elctronoob
Messages
13
Reaction score
3
Moved from a technical forum, so homework template missing.
Hi folks,

I'm revisiting logs for the first time in a long time through distance education and I was wondering if someone could have a look over a question I've answered and let me know if I've done it correctly or if I'm way off please

Find x if Log3(10x – 1) – 2 = 2log3x

I instantly divide by common log of log3 and work out from there

(10x-1) - 2 / 2 = x
(5x- 1/2) -1 = x
5x - 1/2 = x + 1
5x - x = 1 + 1/2
4x = 3/2
x = 3/8

Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By 2Log3, does it mean that it's a log with basis of 2 or 2*Log3?
 
its written as 2log3x, so I take it to mean 2 * log3X
 
If it means
Find ##x## if ##\log_3(10x-1) -2=2*\log_3x##,
I don't understand what you did.

You could take all the ##log_3## terms together, making use of:
##\log_3(a*b)=\log_3a+\log_3b##
##\log_3(a/b)=\log_3a-\log_3b##
##2*\log_3a=\log_3a^2##
##3^{log_3a}=a##

and then solve for x.
 
Since 2log3x = 2 (Log3 + Log x)
which means there will 2 Log 3, so there would be still one Log 3 remaining.

Or you can just actually change the 2Log3x to Log(3x)^2, and then manipulate the left side of equation to be Log, and equals them.
 
Thanks everyone for all the help...its been far too long since I've looked at any of this sort of stuff...
I now have it at
(log310x - log31) - 2 = log3x2
Then divide out the log3
10x - 1 - 3 = x2
0 = x2 -10x + 3

I've obviously done something wrong again as this gives pretty silly results :(
 
You've got to make (log310x - log31) - 2 into one Log3. You don't really divide out the log, but comparing the values inside the logs. They have to be equals, since the logs would result the same.
 
elctronoob said:
Thanks everyone for all the help...its been far too long since I've looked at any of this sort of stuff...
I now have it at
(log310x - log31) - 2 = log3x2
How did you get the expression to the left?
Note that ##\log_3(10x-1)\neq\log_3(10x)-\log_3(1)##

elctronoob said:
Then divide out the log3
Not sure what you mean by "divide out the log3"
 
You start with finding what the value of 2 is in ##log_3##

##log_3(3)=1## and ## log_3(9)=log_3(3^2)=2##

So the RHS becomes ##log_3(10x - 1) - log_3(9) = log_3( (10x - 1) * 1/9) ##

and go from there.
 
  • #10
Samy_A said:
How did you get the expression to the left?
Note that ##\log_3(10x-1)\neq\log_3(10x)-\log_3(1)##

Not sure what you mean by "divide out the log3"

i'm just going round in circles here and getting nowhere I'm afraid
##\log_3(10x-1)=((log_3(10) + log_3(x)) / log_3(1))##

I understood when i had a common log base, i could divide all by that log base
hence ((10 + x) / 1) - 2 = x2
0 = x2 - x - 8

which doesn't give reasonable answers so i must have messed up somewhere again
 
  • #11
You're not dividing by log, you have to get that understanding straight first to solve this problem:

##log3(10x−1) =/= ((log3(10)+log3(x))/log3(1))##
 
  • #13
  • Like
Likes Samy_A and jedishrfu
  • #14
elctronoob said:
i'm just going round in circles here and getting nowhere I'm afraid
##\log_3(10x-1)=((log_3(10) + log_3(x)) / log_3(1))##

I understood when i had a common log base, i could divide all by that log base
hence ((10 + x) / 1) - 2 = x2
0 = x2 - x - 8

which doesn't give reasonable answers so i must have messed up somewhere again

Right folks, I've gone away n come back with an improved effort i think...

log3(10x-1) - 2 = log3(x2)

=log3((10x-1)/x2) = 2

= (10x-1)/x2 = 32 = 9

9x2 -10x + 1 = 0

=>x = 1, x = 1/9

Does this look correct to you guys or am I missing something again?
 
  • Like
Likes Samy_A
  • #15
elctronoob said:
Right folks, I've gone away n come back with an improved effort i think...

log3(10x-1) - 2 = log3(x2)

=log3((10x-1)/x2) = 2

= (10x-1)/x2 = 32 = 9

9x2 -10x + 1 = 0

=>x = 1, x = 1/9

Does this look correct to you guys or am I missing something again?
Looks correct.
 
  • #16
Samy_A said:
Looks correct.

Thanks very much for your help Samy and the rest of you fine people, much appreciated
 
Back
Top