Is my textbook wrong (acceleration problem)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nissan4l0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a textbook's assertion that a body speeds up only when velocity and acceleration share the same sign, and slows down when they differ. The original poster presents a scenario where an object transitions from negative to positive velocity while experiencing positive acceleration, leading to confusion about speed changes. Participants clarify that the object initially has negative velocity and slows down before speeding up in the positive direction. The consensus is that the textbook's explanation holds true when considering the signs of velocity and acceleration correctly throughout the motion. Ultimately, the poster acknowledges their misunderstanding after engaging with the responses.
nissan4l0
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
My textbook, University Physics 12th ed, claims that the sign of x-acceleration does not tell you whether a body is speeding up or slowing down. It claims that the body is speeding up only when the velocity and acceleration have the same sign. Likewise, it claims that a body is slowing down only when the velocity and acceleration differ in signs.

I tried to prove this to myself and found an inconsistency.

v0x = -10 m/s
v1x = 5 m/s


Here, the magnitude of the velocity (speed) is decreasing. The velocity vector itself is positive, since it is going from the negative x-axis to the positive x axis.

So we have a decreasing speed and a positive velocity.

Ok, so what about the acceleration?

I have ax= lim ((5 - (-10)) / \Deltat which is a positive quantity.

So we have a positive acceleration.

According to my book a positive sign on the velocity and a positive sign on the acceleration produce an increase in speed. Am I analyzing this in the wrong manner?(sorry for the poor formatting, I'll improve with time)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nissan4l0 said:
Here, the magnitude of the velocity (speed) is decreasing. The velocity vector itself is positive, since it is going from the negative x-axis to the positive x axis.
You don't know where the object is on the x axis, you only know its velocity.

The acceleration is positive as you say, so at time 0, when the object was moving in the negative direction, the object was slowing down. At time 1 when the object was moving in the positive direction the object was speeding up.

In other words, the object, originally moving in the negative direction, slowed down, came to a stop, and then sped up in the positive direction.
 
nissan4l0 said:
My textbook, University Physics 12th ed, claims that the sign of x-acceleration does not tell you whether a body is speeding up or slowing down. It claims that the body is speeding up only when the velocity and acceleration have the same sign. Likewise, it claims that a body is slowing down only when the velocity and acceleration differ in signs.

I tried to prove this to myself and found an inconsistency.

v0x = -10 m/s
v1x = 5 m/s


Here, the magnitude of the velocity (speed) is decreasing. The velocity vector itself is positive, since it is going from the negative x-axis to the positive x axis.

So we have a decreasing speed and a positive velocity.
Do you mean positive acceleration?
Initially the object was going to the left (x decreasing, negative velocity) finally, it was going to the right (x increasing, positive velocity)

[quoote]Ok, so what about the acceleration?

I have ax= lim ((5 - (-10)) / \Deltat which is a positive quantity.

So we have a positive acceleration.

According to my book a positive sign on the velocity and a positive sign on the acceleration produce an increase in speed. Am I analyzing this in the wrong manner?


(sorry for the poor formatting, I'll improve with time)[/QUOTE]
You statement that velocity is positive is wrong. The velocity is negative for part of the motion, positive for part.
 
Ok, thanks guys it all makes sense to me now that I read and understood your postings. I appreciate it!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top