Is my whole physics career a joke?

AI Thread Summary
Relying on external help and minimal studying has led to success in physics classes, but this approach raises concerns about genuine understanding and long-term retention of knowledge. The individual expresses a struggle to balance academic demands with personal interests and well-being, questioning their fit for a physics career. While many physicists maintain diverse lives outside of academia, the pressure in graduate school can be intense. Developing problem-solving skills in coursework is crucial, as real-world physics often presents complex, unsolved challenges. Ultimately, a deeper engagement with the subject may be necessary for long-term success in the field.
MPKU
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Throughout my undergrad career I relied on help from others, the internet, and the teachers allowing us to use equation sheets during examinations. I received all A's in my upper level physics classes, and B's in the introduction classes (which I used Yahoo answers for almost every homework problem, and figured out how to actually do the problems only a week before the exam). This was an approach I used for my upper level courses too. I hardly read any of the textbooks. I found the solutions to the problems, and then studied how to do those problems, memorized equations, and learned the bare minimum for the tests.

I feel I cheated myself. I'm still doing this in graduate school. Most of my peers also follow this behavior, obviously a bit less in graduate school (or at least they are not as public about it).

I would commit more time to it, but I don't believe physics is my entire life. I know there is the argument that if I'm going to graduate school than it should be what I am passionate about, what I do in my free time.. but I find so much beauty in everything it is hard to devote ALL of my time to studying it.

I like being active, socializing, taking care of myself spiritually, emotionally, physically. Many of those I see in the physics department seem to be lacking in this, in one category or another. I get it. To be truly AMAZING at something you must devote and obsess over it. I can't bring myself to do this.

Am I not cut out for physics? What do I make of this?



Confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eh, plenty of physicists I know have lives outside work. Kids, hobbies. Perhaps less so in grad school, but you've got to have some coping mechanisms to make it through. All physics all the time is a way to burn out.

In addition, performance in classes for learning physics does not neccesarily predict how good you are at doing physics. How are you at research?

However, I think that the most important aspect for being a successful physicist is being able to problem solve, and classes are where you begin to develop that skill. So if you don't develop your skills in classes, where all problems actually have neat solutions, you'll be in a world of pain in real physics, where not only does nobody know how to solve the problem yet, and the solution might be messy, the solution might not actually exist in the first place.
 
  • Like
Likes smashueatu
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top