Is One Textbook Enough for Self-Studying Undergraduate Physics?

AI Thread Summary
Learning all the mathematics required for undergraduate physics from a single mathematical methods textbook is generally considered insufficient. While a comprehensive text may cover many necessary topics, it is unlikely to encompass all the depth and breadth needed for a full understanding of undergraduate physics. A foundational calculus book, such as Stewart's, is recommended as a starting point to build essential skills before tackling more advanced topics. Additionally, resources like Boas' "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences" can serve as a valuable supplement, but students should be prepared to consult additional texts on differential equations, calculus, and linear algebra for clarification on complex concepts. This multi-text approach allows for a more thorough grasp of the mathematical principles essential for physics.
m.gigantic
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can Someone learn all mathematics required for undergraduate physics from only one textbook (mathematical methods in physics texts ) prior to knowing anything in physics especially if he want to self study ? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this method? If I have superficial knowledge in calculus , Can I only read it in a mathematical methods textbook ( I have Riley , Hobson and Bence book which include a chapter on elementary calculus )? Or should I read a calculus book at the level of Stewart book for example ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
m.gigantic said:
Can Someone learn all mathematics required for undergraduate physics from only one textbook (mathematical methods in physics texts ) prior to knowing anything in physics especially if he want to self study ?

All of undergraduate physics? No. Well... maybe if it was a really big book.
 
Probably not one book, but you can follow the standard curriculum set in a uni:

First would be a calculus book, like Stewart's.

Second maybe Boas' Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences. I think the second edition you can get super cheap.

Anything you don't understand in Boas you can get clarification in a Diff EQ, Calc, or a Linear Algebra book.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top