bryan goh
- 7
- 0
Guys, could you help me how to solve the inequality π^x - x^π < 0??
Please post textbook problems in the Homework & Coursework sections, not here in the technical math sections.bryan goh said:Anyway i got this question from my math textbook where i study by myself.
Really? I haven't heard of Lambert W function until well out of university. But then it wasn't a mathematical university.lavinia said:This is a standard Calculus 1 homework problem
I never heard of the Lambert W function.SlowThinker said:Really? I haven't heard of Lambert W function until well out of university. But then it wasn't a mathematical university.
Wolframalpha gives the solution in terms of the LambertW function. Is there an easier expression for the 2.3821790879930187746?lavinia said:I never heard of the Lambert W function.
SlowThinker said:Wolframalpha gives the solution in terms of the LambertW function. Is there an easier expression for the 2.3821790879930187746?
So how do you solve that using Calculus 1 knowledge?lavinia said:I think you want to solve ##log(x)/x > log(π)/π##
Start with observing that \frac{\log(\pi)}{\pi} is a constant.SlowThinker said:So how do you solve that using Calculus 1 knowledge?
And continue how? Remember this is not a proof of existence, we're looking for the value of x where ##\log x/x=\log\pi/\pi##.Svein said:Start with observing that \frac{\log(\pi)}{\pi} is a constant.
If you can approximate this and this is question is from a calculus book, then this sounds like a problem were you should use Newton's method for finding the roots of a function.bryan goh said:yeah, at first i think the solution is x<π. But when i look at the graph, there are another solution that make the inequalities become smaller than zero. Anyway i got this question from my math textbook where i study by myself. and yes i can use a bit of approximation of taylor series
You make a guess of ##x_{0}## which you think is close to the solution. We know ##\pi## is one solution of ##\pi^{x}-x^{\pi}=0## so let's see if there is another solution smaller than ##\pi##. Try using ##x_{0}=0## for simplicity and you should get the other solution.bryan goh said:but what [x][0] must we take