Is Potential Flow Unique in Real Life?

AI Thread Summary
Potential flow is not unique in real life, as different methods can produce the same external shape but yield different flow patterns. For example, both the panel sheet and vortex sheet methods can create identical airfoil shapes, yet they result in distinct flow characteristics. Similarly, a rotating cylinder and a non-rotating cylinder satisfy the same boundary conditions but exhibit different flows due to the arbitrary circulation in the rotating case. To achieve a unique solution in potential flow, specifying circulation is essential, particularly in applications like airfoils where the Kutta Condition must be met for proper lift generation. Ultimately, without defining circulation, the flow solution remains ambiguous and may not accurately represent reality.
flasherffff
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
there is something i can't seem to get about potential flow,

when we work with potential flows we combine some simple potential flows to satisfy some boundary condition (shape of the body and potential at infinity),
we get the resulting flow and we assume that that is the flow in reality

BUT (this is what bothers me) the potential flow that satisfies those boundary condition (shape of the body) is not unique.

example 1: the panel sheet method and vortex sheet method can produce the same external airfoil shape ,but have different flow patterns around them

example 2:the rotating vs the non rotating cylinder
both flows satisfy the same boundary conditions but are different

so... how can we assume that some solution to a given geometry is like reality ,when the solution isn't even unique mathematically
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In potential flow, the solution to Laplace's equation is unique to within a specified constant. Therefore to obtain a unique solution it is necessary to specify this constant and this constant is the circulation. In the case of the rotating cylinder the circulation is completely arbitrary but must be specified. So even though the boundary conditions of the non-rotating cylinder and the rotating cylinder are the same the flows are different because for the rotating cylinder there is circulation.

For the airfoil you don't directly specify the circulation but rather you require that the circulation is chosen to satisfy the Kutta Condition which requires the flow to leave the trailing edge smoothly. So if you place panels on the airfoil surface and then place sources on the panels you can satisfy the boundary conditions and create the airfoil shape but there will be no circulation and therefore no lift. And if the airfoil is at an angle of attack the stagnation point on the trailing edge will be in the wrong place. If you instead use vortices on the panels and indirectly specify the circulation by using the kutta condition you will get the correct trailing edge stagnation point and lift will be generated.

So in summary you must specify the circulation in order to have a unique solution.
 
thank you!
this helped alot.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top