Is PSI in a Pneumatic Line a Measure of Potential Energy?

AI Thread Summary
PSI in a pneumatic line is not a direct measure of potential energy, as pressure is defined as force per unit area rather than energy itself. While pressure can perform work and may be associated with energy density, it does not equate to potential energy in the same way voltage does. The distinction lies in the units of measurement, where energy incorporates length and force, unlike pressure. Therefore, referring to PSI as potential energy density is inaccurate. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate discussions about pneumatic systems and energy concepts.
DJM111188
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I wasn't sure exactly where I should have posted this but here I go...

I was reading that Voltage is a measure of potential energy. With that same mind frame would it be correct to say that PSI is also a measure of potential energy? Specifically referring to the psi in an pneumatic line for say a tool.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
DJM111188 said:
I wasn't sure exactly where I should have posted this but here I go...

I was reading that Voltage is a measure of potential energy. With that same mind frame would it be correct to say that PSI is also a measure of potential energy? Specifically referring to the psi in an pneumatic line for say a tool.
Pressure is not energy, it is force per unit area (pounds per square inch, for example), wheras energy has length*force units (inch-pounds, for example). However, since pressure has the ability to do work, pressure (gas / liquid) may be considered as pressure energy density (energy per unit volume), but Potential Energy density is not the right term here.
 
PhanthomJay said:
Pressure is not energy, it is force per unit area (pounds per square inch, for example), wheras energy has length*force units (inch-pounds, for example). However, since pressure has the ability to do work, pressure (gas / liquid) may be considered as pressure energy density (energy per unit volume), but Potential Energy density is not the right term here.

Gracias sir.
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top