Is R an Equivalence Relation in R x R Based on a Quadratic Equation?

nikie1o2
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
In R x R , ley (x,y) R (u,v) if ax^2 +by^2=au^2 + bv^2, where a,b >0. Determine the relation R is an equivalnce relation. Prove or give a counter example
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi nikie1o2! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

Tell us how far you've got, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi nikie1o2! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

Tell us how far you've got, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:


Hello, thank you for the warm welcome.

I have done equivalence relations before but with just two variables not 4. So i was confused on how to prove the reflexive, symmetric & transitive properties.

For reflexive i was thinking if (x,y)R(x,y) then ax^2+by^2=ax^2+by^2- so that is true
Symmetry: (x,y)R(u,v) then (u,v)R(x,y) is true

For Transitive i knoe if(x,y)R(u,v) and (u,v)R(a,b), then (x,y)R(a,b). I am just confused on how to show the equations for that and that it's true...
 
Moderator's note:
Homework assignments or textbook style exercises for which you are seeking assistance are to be posted in the appropriate forum in our https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=152" area. This should be done whether the problem is part of one's assigned coursework or just independent study.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello nikie1o2! :smile:

(Please use the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
nikie1o2 said:
For Transitive i knoe if(x,y)R(u,v) and (u,v)R(a,b), then (x,y)R(a,b). I am just confused on how to show the equations for that and that it's true...

Just write out the definitions of (x,y)R(u,v) and (u,v)R(a,b) … then it should be obvious! :smile:

(btw, the equivalence classes are a well-known geometrical shape … can you se which?)
 
Just a comment: using "a" and "b" is a bad choice of variable names in this problem. May I suggest using "s" and "t" instead? I.e., use
(u,v)R(s,t)​
instead of
(u,v)R(a,b)​
when working out the transitive property.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top