Is \rhoutt + EIuxxxx = 0 a Linear or Non-Linear Math Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter squenshl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linearity
squenshl
Messages
468
Reaction score
4
I'm trying to see if \rhoutt + EIuxxxx = 0 is linear or non-linear where \rho, E and I are constants.

I got L(u+v) = \rho\delta2u2/\deltat2 + EI\delta4u2/\deltax4 + \rho\delta2uv/\deltat2 + EI\delta4uv/\deltax4 = Lu + Lv. Does this mean it's linear or is there more to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


That is enough.
 


Cheers.
What about this one then.
ut - \alpha^2\nabla^2u = ru(M -u) where \alpha, r & M are constants.

ut - \alpha^2\nabla^2u - ru(M -u) = 0
L(u+v+w) = ut(u+v+w) + \alpha^2\nabla^2u(u+v+w) - ru(M-u)(u+v+w) = utt + \alpha^2\nabla^2u2 - ru2(M-u) + utv + \alpha^2\nabla^2uv - ruv(M-u) + utw + \alpha^2\nabla^2uw - ruw(M-u) = Lu + Lv + Lw
 
Last edited:


Are these equation linear or non-linear?

ut + (1-u)ux = 0
uxx + exutt = sin(x)
uxx + uxy + uyy + ux = t2
 


Someone help please.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top