Is spin angular momentum increasing in a gyroscope?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between spin angular momentum and precession frequency in gyroscopes. The equation for precession frequency suggests that angular momentum remains constant over time, but the user questions whether the spin angular momentum is actually increasing. It is clarified that angular momentum is conserved unless acted upon by external torque, meaning it cannot increase without such influence. Changes in moment of inertia could occur if the gyroscope's shape changes, but overall angular momentum should remain constant or decrease slightly due to friction. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these principles in gyroscopic motion.
applestrudle
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
In my textbook there is an equation for the precession frequency:

Ω = τ/Iω

The derivation in the book shows no difference in the spin angular momentum at time t = 0 and t = delta t but when I tried it I got that the denominator of the above equation must be the 'new' angular momentum (at t = delta t)

If the spin angular momentum is increasing with time wouldn't that means the precession frequency would be decreasing but my textbook says constant velocity

:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you are asking, but angular momentum is conserved, so it can't increase without some external torque. The moment of inertia could change if the gyroscope changes shape, but the angular momentum should stay constant, or be slowly decreasing due to friction.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top