Is Spivak's Calculus Book Too Difficult for an Average Person to Understand?

  • Thread starter Thread starter madah12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
Spivak's Calculus book is considered challenging, even for those with a solid mathematical background. Many readers struggle with its high level of sophistication, which is comparable to advanced analysis courses. To better understand calculus, it's recommended to strengthen foundational knowledge in algebra and trigonometry. Alternative resources, such as "Calculus Made Easy" by Silvanus P. Thompson, are suggested for a more accessible introduction. Overall, mastering calculus requires a conceptual understanding and logical thinking rather than just rote learning.
madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1
I can't understand this book!

I have this book calculus fourth edition by spivak but it is too hard for me to comprehend ( yes I am admitting that) i searched the net and other people found it hard too, is there any resource materials that people who took this book think I should get to understand it better? should I wait for after graduate studies for it? or is it a book that requires high iq that an average person like me will have trouble understanding?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Math is a language you are going to have to learn in order to succeed in it. More than just letters, numbers, and symbols...mathematics is a world of logic. Calculus is pretty simple, but you have to understand conceptually what is happening in every problem you do. This will separate the good math students from the rest. As far as understanding the material, you may have to relate back to algebra and gain a truly better understanding of mathematics. Take simple steps in math and make sure you understand it logically. Review your algebra and trig, make sure you understand it and what it represents. I think calculus will look much less complex after doing this. It is about teaching yourself *how to think* rather than really the material itself.
 


that book treats calculus at the highest level of sophistication, roughly comparable to the analysis courses most majors take as seniors, after completing three or four calculus courses.

there is no need at all to begin there. In general never use a book you cannot read. Any other calculus book almost, will be easier to understand than that one. Try calcuus made easy by silvanus p thompson.

or lectures on freshman calculus by cruse and granberg.

or just browse in the math library.

but really, calculus is never actually easy.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top