Is stablility a byproduct of a chemical reaction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between stability and entropy in chemical reactions. It highlights that the products of a reaction are typically more thermodynamically stable than the reactants. Universal entropy is noted to be constantly increasing, while local entropy can decrease in certain processes, such as condensation. Some reactions, like the explosive TATP, are driven primarily by entropy rather than thermodynamic stability. Clarification on specific questions about these concepts is encouraged for further understanding.
LogicalAcid
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
In other words, the whole point of the reaction is not to stabilize? And then, how does entropy have anything to do with a reaction?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understand what you mean, but...

In general, the product of a chemical reaction is more stable (thermodynamically) than the starting material. Also remember that UNIVERSAL entropy is what is constantly increasing. Local entropy can decrease (condensing water, for example). But like I said, I'm not sure what exactly you're asking. If you clarify maybe I can help more.
 
pzona said:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean, but...

In general, the product of a chemical reaction is more stable (thermodynamically) than the starting material. Also remember that UNIVERSAL entropy is what is constantly increasing. Local entropy can decrease (condensing water, for example). But like I said, I'm not sure what exactly you're asking. If you clarify maybe I can help more.

I second the above and add: That some reactions are driven by entropy alone.
For example the entropic explosive TATP, tri acetone tri peroxide. The rapid reaction from
a solid to gases. One of the products is acetone ! (so not thermodynamically driven)
http://en.wikipedia.org./wiki/Acetone_peroxide
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top