MHB Is that correct so far ... ?Yes, that is correct. Good job!

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am trying to gain an understanding of the basics of elementary algebraic geometry and am reading Dummit and Foote Chapter 15: Commutative Rings and Algebraic Geometry ...

At present I am focused on Section 15.1 Noetherian Rings and Affine Algebraic Sets ... ...

I need help to get started on Exercise 26 of Section 15.1 ...Exercise 26 of Section 15.1 reads as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/4764Help with this exercise will be much appreciated ...

Peter
***EDIT***

Thoughts so far are as follows:

... ...

I am assuming that when Dummit and Foote ask us to show that $$\phi$$ is a morphism that, given the context, they are referring to what they have defined as a morphism or polynomial map between two algebraic sets ... in which case we would have to be sure we were actually dealing with a map between algebraic sets ... now $$V$$ is obviously by its definition, an algebraic set ... but ... how do we show that $$\mathbb{A}^1$$ is an algebraic set ... ?If, however we assume that both $$V$$ and $$\mathbb{A}^1$$ are indeed algebraic sets then we have to show that:

$$\phi \ : \ \mathbb{A}^1 \rightarrow V$$

is a morphism or polynomial map of algebraic sets ... that is we have to show that there exists polynomials $$\phi_1, \phi_2, \phi_3$$ such that:

$$\phi(a) = ( \phi_1 (a) , \phi_2 (a) , \phi_3 (a) )$$

But, this is obviously true with

$$\phi_1 (a) = a^3 \ , \ \phi_2 (a) = a^4 \ , \ \phi_3 (a) = a^5$$ ...

Is that correct so far ... ?

But... not sure of how to show the surjectivity ... even with the hint ...

Further ... I need help to make a significant start on parts (b) and (c) ...Hope someone can help ... particularly with parts (b) and (c) ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's go one step at a time.

Suppose $(0,y,z)$ is in the zero set.

Then $xz - y^2 = 0 \implies y^2 = 0 \implies y = 0$.

Similarly, $z^2 - x^2y = 0 \implies z^2 = 0 \implies z = 0$.

Thus either ALL of $x,y,z$ are $0$, or $x \neq 0$.

Now it is clear that $(x,y,z) = (t^3,t^4,t^5)$ is in the zero set, for any $t \in k$:

$xz - y^2 = t^3t^5 - (t^4)^2 = t^8 - t^8 = 0$
$yz - x^3 = t^4t^5 - (t^3)^3 = t^9 - t^9 = 0$
$z^2 - x^3y = (t^5)^2 - (t^3)^2t^4 = t^{10} - t^6t^4 = t^{10} - t^{10} = 0$.

So we see that $\{(t^3,t^4,t^5): t\in k\} \subseteq \mathcal{Z}$. The question becomes: is EVERY element of the zero set of that form?

Now if $(x,y,z) \neq 0$, we see that $x \neq 0$. Thus $x$ is a unit of $k$. Hence $y = ax$ for some $a \in k$ (namely $a = \dfrac{y}{x}$).

Then:

$xz - y^2 = 0 \iff xz - a^2x^2 = 0 \iff x(z - a^2x) = 0 \implies z - a^2x = 0$ (since $x \neq 0$).

So $(x,y,z) = (x,ax,a^2x)$.

Consequently, re-writing $yz - x^3 = 0$:

$ax(a^2x) - x^3 = 0 \implies a^3x^2 - x^3 = 0 \implies x^2(a^3 - x) = 0 \implies a^3 = x$

so $(x,y,z) = (a^3,a^4,a^5)$, or if you prefer: $(x,y,z)\neq 0 \in \mathcal{Z} \implies (x,y,z) = \left(\dfrac{x^3}{y^3},\dfrac{x^4}{y^4},\dfrac{x^5}{y^5}\right)$

Now the zero set point $(0,0,0)$ is clearly of the form: $(0^3,0^4,0^5)$, so this shows the zero set is contained in the image of $\phi$, so $\phi$ is surjective.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K