Is the Claim About the Fan's Discharge Rate and Velocity Reasonable?

a13x
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Been at this question for some time an needing a double check to see if things are right.

A fan that consumes 20W of eletric power when operating is claimed to discharge air from a ventilaed room at a rate of 0.25 kg/s at a discharge velocity of 8 m/s. Determine if this claim is reasonable?


Homework Equations


KE of wind = 0.5 mv^2
20W = 20 j/s


The Attempt at a Solution


When i worked it out i calculated it would be 8J. This seems to be posible for a 20W fan to do this work. Is this correct??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You probably mean 8J/s - but yes, 40% efficency sounds reasonable.
 
Sorry, I did mean 8J/s.

Thankyou for the reply
 
Another question, related to the written above -
Is that correct to estimate the "usefull power" of a fan in the following way:

0- Estimating Force applied on fan. we get F.
1 - Estimating the velocity of the wind near the fan. we get Vo.
2 - using this estimation alone (ignoring wind decay & turbulences & whatever happens far from fan) to look at the picture from the wind's frame of reference- where the fan is moving with speed of -Vo, thus calculating P=Vo*F.

It's stage 2 I'm not completely sure of .. is that stage's logic OK?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top