I have a problem with static/non-static spacetime. The problem is that the notion of spacetime includes time itself, so how can it change with(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); time?

Imagine an asteroid approaching the Earth-Moon system. The Earth-Moon system is a non-static spacetime, so presumably is giving off gravitational waves. But in principle it should be possible to use GR to calculate the asteroid's trajectory (treating it a test object), in other words, to obtain the equations of the geometry of spacetime of such system. Gravitational waves would be described within that geometry. I suppose that the spacetime geometry around such system is too complicated, so we choose to treat it as a static spacetime and then consider the movement of the two massive bodies as some kind of perturbation. So my question is: is the concept of non-static spacetime a mere approximation to the real thing?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Is the concept of non-static spacetime a mere approximation?

Loading...

Similar Threads - concept static spacetime | Date |
---|---|

I Charged black hole - static electric field lines | Feb 1, 2018 |

B Why do we need the concept of "event" in SR | Jun 15, 2017 |

I Concept q -- affine parameter and coordinate time geodesic | Jan 30, 2017 |

I Why was time dilation under GR a new concept? | Dec 19, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**