Is the Electric Field Always Zero on an Imaginary Surface Containing No Charge?

geronimo8
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A certain region of space bounded by an imaginary closed surface contains no charge.
Is the electric field always zero on the surface? If not, under what circumstances is it zero on the surface?


Homework Equations


Φ = Qenclosed÷εo = EA


The Attempt at a Solution


Since the imaginary surface need no any material object. I think the E refres to the inside surface, so it is not zero...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine the field produced by a single positive point charge at the origin, you know what the field looks like. Now, draw your surface as a sphere that does not include the origin. What does the field look like on the surface? Is it zero?
 
I can't imagine that clearly... *sigh* sorry...
 
Last edited:
One question related to this problem: When you get asked about the electric field on the surface is it the average electric field over the surface?? I mean, in the case of a sphere, only when having the charge in the center will you have the same electric field all throughout the surface...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top