Is the electric field inside a circuit non-conservative?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the electric field inside a circuit is conservative. It is clarified that while the electric field in conductors is conservative, the field associated with electromotive force (emf) is not, as it does work on charges moving through the circuit. Circuit theory does not typically address electric fields directly, focusing instead on energy conservation within the circuit. The work done by the circuit is attributed to external forces, such as chemical or mechanical, rather than the electric field itself. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexity of understanding electric fields in the context of circuit theory and energy dynamics.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
As charge moves around a circuit, their energy increases by each loop.

However, I just heard somebody say the total electric field inside a circuit is conservative.

How is that possible? Is the field conservative or not? Why?

Thanks for all help! :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Wires are conductors, so within them yes- the line integral of the electric field is 0. But within the emf, this is not true, so the field is not conservative there.
 
In circuit theory you don't deal directly with electric fields, so I don't know how this question arises. In circuit theory the length of a wire or the physical size of a lumped element is unknown. The E-field is the spatial gradient of the voltage, so to know it you would have to know the physical size of the circuit element, as well as the voltage change acorss it. So the electric field is simply something that you do not need and cannot determine within the constraints of circuit theory.

However, energy is conserved in circuit theory. The work done on a circuit is always equal to the work done by the circuit plus the energy stored in the circuit.
 
You can answer this very generally: Whenever and wherever there is a time-dependent magnetic field the electric field cannot be a potential field, because then and there according to Faraday's Law one has
\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=-\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{B} \neq 0.
For a field to have a scalar potential, i.e. to have
\vec{E}=-\vec{\nabla} \vec \Phi,
its curl necessarily must vanish, which is not the case when a time-dependent magnetic field is present.
 
So let's say you have a circuit without any magnetic field inside to speak of. Then the E-field inside the circuit is defined as conservative??

However, how do you then explain the emf increasing the energy of every charge going a loop through the circuit?
 
Nikitin said:
However, how do you then explain the emf increasing the energy of every charge going a loop through the circuit?
What needs to be explained about it?
 
isn't the emf-source part of the circuit and its electric field?
 
Yes. Although, as I mentioned earlier the fields are outside the scope of circuit theory.
 
I'm a complete noob (1st year uni) so don't overestimate me: How can a field be conservative if it does work on a particle going one loop around?
 
  • #10
Note that inside the source charge carriers are pushed "uphill" against the electric field, so there must be some other force (chemical, mechanical etc) acting on them. This force does all the work.
 
  • #11
ohhh, so it's not an electrical field which does the work?

Allright, then I get it. thanks for all the help, guys!
 
  • #12
Nikitin said:
I'm a complete noob (1st year uni) so don't overestimate me: How can a field be conservative if it does work on a particle going one loop around?
Think of another conservative force, like gravity. If water goes downhill (e.g. a river) then gravity does work on the water. The water can be used to do work on other things (e.g. a turbine). Then, if you want to continue the process you have to pump the water back up the hill.
 
Back
Top