Is the Equation x^{a^b} = (x^{a^{b-1}})^a True for All Natural Numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter notnottrue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents
notnottrue
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,
If all x,a,b and c are all natural numbers, is this true?
x^{a^b} = (x^{a^{b-1}})^a
Proof
if c = a^{b-1}
ca = (a^{b-1})a = a^b
and (x^c)^a = x^{ca} = x^{a^b}

Could I please have some feedback on this,
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is no universal agreement on whether zero is a natural number. You are going to need write "positive integer" or deal with the case when one or a number of the variables are zero separately.
 
Last edited:
notnottrue said:
Hi,
If all x,a,b and c are all natural numbers, is this true?
x^{a^b} = (x^{a^{b-1}})^a

Yes, and the proof doesn't require any substitutions either. Simply following your exponent laws,

\left(x^{a^{b-1}}\right)^a
=x^{a^{b-1}a}
=x^{a^{b-1+1}}
=x^{a^b}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
66
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
931
Back
Top