Is the Integral of ln(x)/(x+2) from 0 to 5 an Improper Integral?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ElectricMile
  • Start date Start date
ElectricMile
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
the question states:

Is the integral, from 0 to 5, ln(x)/(x+2) dx, an improper integral? do not try to compute this integral.

the answer: Yes, ln(x) undifined when x = 0.

WHAT, why is this so, i thought an improper integral is when i take the upper/lower bound and replace it with infinity and take the limit? any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two catagories (three, if you count both as a separate category) of improper integrals: those that have infinite bounds, like

\int_{a}^{\infty} f(x)dx, \int_{-\infty}^{b} f(x)dx ,\mbox{ and } \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x)dx,

and those which have integrands possessing infinite discountinuities somewhere in the domain of integration, and both. Yours is of the second variety.
 
The label "improper integral" is attached to any definite integral where the function blows up or is otherwise undefined at the endpoints (points on the interval can be dealt with as well). In these cases the integral is defined as a limit, here:

\int_0^5 \frac{\log x}{x+2} dx=\lim_{\delta\rightarrow 0^+}\int_\delta^5 \frac{\log x}{x+2} dx
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top