Is the Limit Definition of a Definite Integral Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenPrint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0
\int^{b}_{a} f(x) dx = lim_{c → a^{+}} lim_{d → b^{-}} \int^{d}_{c} f(x) dx

Is this true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GreenPrint said:
\int^{b}_{a} f(x) dx = lim_{c → a^{+}} lim_{d → b^{-}} \int^{d}_{c} f(x) dx

Is this true?

What are the arguments of the limit in this case?
 
HACR said:
What are the arguments of the limit in this case?

a and b on the left hand side and I replaced these with c and d evaluated with limits with a and b, a from the right and b from the left.
 
Yes it always true, either if f(x) is continuos on [a,b] or on (a,b). In the first case you have a proper integral, in fact the primitive F(x) is also continuos and the limit is the value of F at a (or b). In the second case you have an improper integral and in that case is necessary to use the limit to check whether or not the result is a finite value.
 
hmmm...
ya i guess so thanks
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top