Is the Maxwell-Chern-Simons Action Gauge-Invariant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maybe_Memorie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Maybe_Memorie
Messages
346
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



##(a)## Consider the following action in three space-time dimensions
##S_{CS}=\displaystyle \int d^3x\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}A_\mu \partial_\nu A_\rho##
It is known as the Chern-Simons action.

Demonstrate that it is gauge-invariant.

Show that any solution to the equations of motion for the above action is gauge-equivalent to a trivial solution.

##(b)## Find the equations of motion for the following Maxwell-Chern-Simons action:
##S=-\frac{1}{4e^2}\displaystyle \int d^3x F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} + \displaystyle \int d^3x\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}A_\mu \partial_\nu A_\rho##

Show that each component of ##F_{\mu\nu}## satisfies the Klein-Gordon equation.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
##(a)## The action is gauge invariant if it is invariant under the transformation ##A_\mu \rightarrow A_\mu + \partial_\mu \Lambda##, where ##\Lambda## is a function of the space-time coordinates. Under this transformation, ##S_{CS} \rightarrow S_{CS}' = k \displaystyle \int d^3x \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho} (A_\mu + \partial_\mu \Lambda) \partial_\nu (A_\rho + \partial_\rho \Lambda)##

##= k \displaystyle \int d^3x \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}(A_\mu \partial_\nu A_\rho + A_\mu\partial_\nu \partial_rho \Lambda + \partial_\mu \Lambda\partial_\nu A_\rho + \partial_\mu \Lambda \partial_\nu \partial_\rho \Lambda)##

## =S_{CS} + k \displaystyle \int d^3x \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}(A_\mu\partial_\nu \partial_rho \Lambda + \partial_\mu \Lambda\partial_\nu A_\rho + \partial_\mu \Lambda \partial_\nu \partial_\rho \Lambda)##

##(*)## Note that ##\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}A_\mu\partial_\nu \partial_\rho \Lambda = - \epsilon^{\mu\rho\nu}A_\mu\partial_\nu \partial_\rho \Lambda## by anti-symmetry of ##\epsilon##
## =- \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}A_\mu\partial_\rho \partial_\nu \Lambda## after renaming indicies
## = - \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}A_\mu\partial_\nu \partial_\rho \Lambda## due to the symmetry ##\partial_\nu \partial_\rho=\partial_\rho \partial_\nu##
##=0##.

Same argument holds for the last term in the integrand and we are left with ##S_{CS}'=S_{CS} + k \displaystyle \int d^3x \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}\partial_\mu \Lambda \partial_\nu A_\rho##

Applying the product rule backwards and using the same argument as above in ##(*)## we find that ## \displaystyle \int d^3x \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}\partial_\mu \Lambda \partial_\nu A_\rho = \displaystyle \int d^3x \partial_\mu (\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho} \Lambda \partial_\nu A_\rho)##

Applying the divergence theorem this becomes ##\displaystyle \int dS n_\mu \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho} \Lambda \partial_\nu A_\rho##, where ##n_\mu## is a normal vector pointing outward from the surface, which is a surface integral equal to ##0## under the assumption that the fields fall off sufficiently fast at infinity. Hence the action is gauge-invariant.

The Lagrangian for this action is ##\mathcal{L}_{CS}=\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}A_\mu \partial_\nu A_\rho##. I'm not going to write out the full procedure for getting the equations of motion, but we find that they are
##k\epsilon^{\rho\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}=0##

I am unsure what the phrase "gauge equivalent to a trivial solution" means. I know that the equations of motion are gauge-invariant so nothing will change, but I don't really know what it's asking me to do.##(b)## Again, not going through finding the e.o.m, but we find that they are ##\partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu} + ke^2\epsilon^{\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\alpha\beta}=0##

The Klein-Gordon equation is ##(\partial_\mu \partial^\mu + m^2)\phi=0##. I was reading a paper on this theory and it said this can be done by writing ##\tilde{F^\mu}=\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}F_{\nu\rho}## and then the e.o.m. can be written as ##(\partial^\nu \partial_\nu + (ke^2)^2)\tilde{F^\mu}=0##. I have no idea why this is justified.Any help on the two issues above would be very appreciated. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump
 
Bump
 
Bump
 
Bump, but I'm guessing there's no point. This is the last time I'll do it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top