Is the Motion of a String Described by y(x,t) SHM?

aks_sky
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The displacement y of a long string at position x and time t is given by

y(x,t) = cos (kx-wt) + sin (kx-wt)

Show that the motion of the string at any point is SHM.


The Attempt at a Solution



As far as i know this is something to do with adding 2 waves together and in this case we have a sinusoidal wave and a cosine wave. If one wave is the reflection of the other then a standing wave will develop, and i think that in this case a standing wave will develop and that would mean that the motion of the string is SHM.

Is that correct? Would there be a better explanation as to why the motion is in SHM.

p.s not homework, just past exam question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To prove the motion a SHM, just transform the displacement into the form of cosine or sine. In this problem, I think it's completely about mathematics.
How would you prove that this is standing wave by the way?
 
aks_sky said:

The Attempt at a Solution



As far as i know this is something to do with adding 2 waves together and in this case we have a sinusoidal wave and a cosine wave. If one wave is the reflection of the other then a standing wave will develop, and i think that in this case a standing wave will develop and that would mean that the motion of the string is SHM.

Is that correct? Would there be a better explanation as to why the motion is in SHM.

p.s not homework, just past exam question.
For a standing wave, you must have two waves traveling in opposite directions -- not the case here, since both waves travel in the +x direction.

You could try the angle-addition formulas for sine and cosine, and work through the algebra.

Hope that helps.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top