Is the Origin for a Sawhorse at C or -D/2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sjogosk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Origin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the placement of the origin for a sawhorse, questioning whether it should be at point C or at -D/2. Participants clarify that if the origin is at C, the center of mass (M) of the plank would indeed be at C, making M equal to 0 from that origin. There is confusion regarding the distance between C and the left support point, which is noted as -D/2. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately identifying the origin to solve related problems effectively. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the need for clear problem statements in discussions.
sjogosk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Summary: So we are just going to ignore the distance between C and the left support point (-D/2)? If the origin is at C, doesn't this mean M is -D/2 from the origin? In the evaluation, they clearly acknowledged that there is a distance between C and xp which is (-D/2)...

Center of Gravity.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You wish to discuss a solution to a problem without stating or displaying the problem?

sjogosk said:
If the origin is at C, doesn't this mean M is -D/2 from the origin?
If the origin is at C and the center of mass of the plank (M) is at C then this means that M is 0 from the origin, surely.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Oh okay yeah I misread the question..the M is the mass of the plank not some other object. Thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top