Is the transfer from 2D mechanics to 3D mechanics intimidating?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d 3d Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
Transitioning from 2D to 3D mechanics is generally manageable, as many principles remain consistent, with the added complexity of more variables. Familiarity with vector algebra, particularly dot and cross products, is beneficial, as is understanding parametric notation. While some problems can be simplified by identifying symmetries, not all scenarios allow for reduction to 2D. The inertia tensor may appear intimidating, but it is more straightforward than it seems. Overall, the discussion emphasizes that with practice and understanding, the shift to 3D mechanics can be navigated effectively.
  • #51
What? No! There were always only two cords! Can't believe you're suspecting me, is this what our marriage based on?!? :-p

But, seriously, two cords. When did you go on inventing a cord?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Playing tricks on each other that work out funny? Definitely! :approve:

The very first time I looked at the picture I immediately saw a cord between A and D, and I thought: Hey, that's a funny problem! :smile:

And when you had the question: "In the solution manual they appeared to have ignored it [Ed. CD]! i.e. not even include it as a vector! This is false, right?"
I drew the wrong conclusion they had removed CD to make the problem solvable.

Looking more carefully at the picture, I guess AD was not intended as a cord.
 
  • #53
And when you had the question: "In the solution manual they appeared to have ignored it [Ed. CD]! i.e. not even include it as a vector! This is false, right?"
I drew the wrong conclusion they had removed CD to make the problem solvable.

I was referring to Tcdx when I said that! That's what they completely seemed to ignore!

Looking more carefully at the picture, I guess AD was not intended as a cord.
Yea, it's not mentioned in the question, it's just a line to define the shape I guess, but I can see why you got confused! :smile:
 
Back
Top