Is the Transformed Function a Solution to Laplace's Equation?

merrypark3
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that

If \phi(x,y,z) is a solution of Laplace's equation, show that
\frac{1}{r}\phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} ) is also a solution


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



let \psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} ) is a solution.

Then in the spherical coordinate,

\psi=\frac{1}{r} \phi ( \frac{1}{r} , \theta , \varphi )

So input \psi to the spherical laplace equation.

\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{∂}{∂r} (r^2 \frac{∂\psi}{∂r}) = \frac {2}{r^4} \frac{∂\phi}{∂r} - \frac{1}{r^3} \frac{∂^2 \phi}{∂r^2}

The derivation with other angles, same to the original one, except 1/r times factor.

But the r part for the original one is

\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{∂}{∂r} (r^2 \frac{∂\phi}{∂r}) = \frac {2}{r} \frac{∂\phi}{∂r} + \frac{∂^2 \phi}{∂r^2}

What's wrong with me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
merrypark3 said:
let \psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} ) is a solution.

Here you are assuming what you are trying to prove. That is not usually a good idea.

Instead, just compute the Laplacian of \psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} ) and show that it is zero if \nabla^2 \phi(x,y,z)=0

Then in the spherical coordinate,

\psi=\frac{1}{r} \phi ( \frac{1}{r} , \theta , \varphi )

No. What are x, y and z in terms of spherical coordinates r, \theta and \varphi? What does that make \frac{x}{r^2}, \frac{y}{r^2}, and \frac{z}{r^2}?
 


\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )= \frac{1}{r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})

\frac{∂}{∂r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})= -( \frac{ sin\theta cos\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ sin\theta sin\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ cos\theta}{r^2}\frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})} )

Then how can I calculate the terms like \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}?
 
merrypark3 said:
\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )= \frac{1}{r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})

good.

\frac{∂}{∂r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})= -( \frac{ sin\theta cos\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ sin\theta sin\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ cos\theta}{r^2}\frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})} )

Then how can I calculate the terms like \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}?

Just use a substitution like \bar{x} \equiv \frac{\sin \theta \cos\varphi}{r}, \bar{y} \equiv \frac{\sin \theta \sin\varphi}{r}, and \bar{z} \equiv \frac{\cos \theta}{r} to make it easier to write:

\frac{\partial \phi\left( \frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} \right)}{\partial (\frac{\sin \theta \cos\varphi}{r})} = \frac{ \partial \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial \bar{x}}?

In the end, you should get something like \nabla^2 \psi = \text{some factor} * \left[ \frac{ \partial^2 \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial^2 \bar{x}} + \frac{ \partial^2 \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial^2 \bar{y}} + \frac{ \partial^2 \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial^2 \bar{z}} \right]

Aside: Changing the size on all your posts makes them difficult to read (for my eyes anyways), please stop it.
 
I am stuck on this too

Hi!

I was just trying to solve this problem through this same approach (make the substitutions \overline{x}=\sin(\theta)\cos(\phi)/r, etc...). But it turns out to be *very* complicated. Do you have finished this one? Can you show me more explicit steps? Thanks a lot!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top