Boeing Is the Wing Size of the Boeing 737-700 Calculated Using NACA Airfoil Shape?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tobi101
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the wing size and aerodynamics of the Boeing 737-700, with a request for detailed information beyond what is available on the Boeing website. Participants note that the Wikipedia article provides useful general values like wing area, wingspan, and sweep angle for various 737 models. There is uncertainty regarding the specific NACA airfoil number for the 737-700, with suggestions that it may not be publicly disclosed. One contributor asserts that the airfoil shape is not strictly based on NACA designs. The conversation highlights the challenges in obtaining precise aerodynamic data for the aircraft.
tobi101
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Boeing 737-700 Wing size??

Just working on basic aerodynamics of a boeing 737-700, and need a more detailed description on the wing size, or area as the boeing site only supplies limited information which can be used to calculate general values such as speed (m/s). Can anyone help please?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The wikipedia article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737
lists the wing area, wingspan and sweep angle for most of the variants. While they may not be exact, that's enough to get you pretty close.
 


Thanks, and what would the 737-700 NACA number be?
 


tobi101 said:
Thanks, and what would the 737-700 NACA number be?

My guess is that's a company secret...
 


I can assure you that airfoil shape is not NACA. I can't speak from personal knowledge, but it may be based on one, but surely not one.
 
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Venus does not have a magnetosphere, so the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment shall be much worse than in a LEO environment. Looking to the std radiation models for Venus, the standard radiation-hard space level electronic component with tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg seems not enough, so, for example, a 1cm2 Si die will suffer considerable flux above this level during a long mission (10 years for example). So, the question is, usually we are not paying attention to latch-up...
Back
Top