Is There a Problem with My Graph Drawing Homework?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dingo_d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drawing Graph
dingo_d
Messages
199
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to draw the running coupling constant graph like this one:

running_coupling.gif


And I have a formula:

\frac{1}{\alpha(\mu)} = \frac{1}{\alpha(M_Z)} + \frac{b}{2\pi}\ln\frac{\mu}{M_{Z}}

And I have the necessary data to draw \frac{1}{\alpha_i(\mu)}-\log(\mu) graph (I have \alpha_i^{-1}(M_Z), b_i, and M_Z).

And I plug that in in Mathematica and I cannot seem to get that graph! I tried by replacing the \frac{1}{\alpha(\mu)} with y, and \log(\mu) with x, and plotting that, I've tried by not changing the logarithm, and making the LogPlot, but no go.

I really don't know what I'm doing wrong :(

I looked at 3 papers on this topic, to see if I got the constants wrong, but I didn't see anything different :|

arXiv:hep-ph/0012288v2, arXiv:0711.2903v1 [hep-ph], and arXiv:hep-ph/9705479v1

EDIT:

Never mind! I reversed the sign of the b somehow... xD
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
so where is your graph for comparison?

You've checked the units ofmeasure for each quantity and constant you're using?

It looks like both x and y axes are log based. Are you using the same kind of chart?

The formula is using natural log base e and it looks like the sample chart is using log base 10.
 
I've found what I've done wrong. The b constants had reversed sign :D

Thanks anyway :D
 
That's good. Many times just explaining it helps you find your error.
 
jedishrfu said:
That's good. Many times just explaining it helps you find your error.

True that! :D

I do that sometimes with my friends, and in the midst of explaining them the issue, I find the solution :D
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top