Is there a relationship between these numbers from the Phi function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lokolo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship
Lokolo
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Doing maths cousework, Phi Function and i came out with these numbers (i dnt no if it has anything do to with phi number yet)

i) Φ (4²) = Φ(16) = 2
ii) Φ (6²) = Φ(36) = 12
iii) Φ (8²) = Φ(64) = 32

its looks as if there could b a relatonship between them but i can't see one, can you?
thanks

Lokolo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phi(16) != 2, since 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15 are all coprime to 16. phi(16) = 8.
 
opps yeh sorry, so do you think there will be a general forumla? i have got one for prime squares
Φ(p²) = p² - p
where p = prime
but not one for all others
 
Well... phi(ab) = phi(a)phi(b) if a and b are relatively prime, and phi(p^n) = p^n - p^(n - 1) where p is a prime and n a natural number. Those are the ones I know of. And of course, those two formulas taken together provide an easy way to compute phi(x) if you know the prime factorization of x.
 
Last edited:
wow, i have a lot of testin to do...
thanks muzza
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top