B Is there a specific way to pronounce subscripts in symbols?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Caleb2400
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the pronunciation of symbols with subscripts, specifically how an instructor pronounces "M with a subscript of a" as "ace of M" and "C with a subscript of M" as "emps of C." Participants express confusion over this method, suggesting that the more common pronunciation is "M sub a" and "C sub M." Some speculate that the instructor may have a speech issue, such as dyslexia, affecting his pronunciation. The conversation highlights the lack of a standardized rule for enunciating subscripts in symbols. Overall, the topic raises questions about the variations in teaching methods and pronunciation in academic settings.
Caleb2400
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
When my instructor lists off symbols with super and subscript, he pronounces it in a way I've never heard before. For example, M with a subscript of "a" sounds like he is saying "ace of M" and C with a subscript of M sounds like " emps of C". Is this common? If so, where is the rule for enunciation?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you don't have the letters backwards? It seems to me he would probably be saying "a sub M" and "M sub C."
 
  • Like
Likes Caleb2400
Caleb2400 said:
When my instructor lists off symbols with super and subscript, he pronounces it in a way I've never heard before. For example, M with a subscript of "a" sounds like he is saying "ace of M" and C with a subscript of M sounds like " emps of C". Is this common? If so, where is the rule for enunciation?
Maybe he's dyslexic.:oldbiggrin:

Many would say Ma as "M sub a" and CM as "C sub M". If he's saying "a sub M" it would be aM and similar for the other one.
 
  • Like
Likes Caleb2400 and symbolipoint
Thank you all so much!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top