Is there another, better way of doing this? (simple circuit diagram)

  • Thread starter Thread starter wannab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Diagram
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an alternative method to use a switch for a circuit that remains on until power is cut or a switch is opened. Participants explore various switching mechanisms, including relays, transistors, and other creative solutions, while considering the cost and specifications of components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using transistors instead of relays due to cost concerns and voltage requirements.
  • Another proposes unconventional methods such as using a mousetrap or explosive charge to create a switch mechanism.
  • There is a discussion about the need for the circuit to be able to switch off, which challenges the notion of a "permanent" switch.
  • Participants inquire about the voltage and current specifications needed for the circuit, with one stating a preference for a low-cost solution.
  • Clarifications are sought regarding circuit symbols and component functions, such as the role of an inductor and resistor in the proposed designs.
  • One participant mentions a specific relay option available online, questioning its applicability to lower voltage and current scenarios.
  • Links to external resources are provided, suggesting various circuit designs that could meet the requirements.
  • A recommendation is made for using an SCR circuit, with advice on component arrangement to ensure functionality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to achieve the desired switching mechanism, with no consensus reached on a single solution. The discussion remains open-ended with multiple competing ideas and methods proposed.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the effectiveness of transistors for maintaining a permanent current flow and the implications of using various unconventional switching methods. There are also unresolved questions regarding the specifications and functions of components within the proposed circuits.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals looking for cost-effective solutions for circuit design, particularly those exploring alternatives to relays in low-voltage applications.

wannab
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
K4pwP67.jpg


I need one small input to switch on a slightly larger circuit permanently, until I cut the power off or until I open the switch. Relays seem a bit expensive and intended for higher voltage applications than I require. Is there a way to swap the relay here with transistors or something?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Depends on how you want to control the switch and under what circumstances.
i.e. you could short-circuit the main one with a wire, and put a small explosive charge (like a firecracker) under the wire. Use a NiCad element to light the fuse.

You could use a knife-switch and a servo.

Since this is to be a "once on always on" device...
You could use a mousetrap as a spring-loaded knife-switch, held open by a bit of fuse wire - blow the fuse and close the switch. (There's a lot you can do with spring-loaded switches.)

But what you do depends on the circumstances.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Depends on how you want to control the switch and under what circumstances.
i.e. you could short-circuit the main one with a wire, and put a small explosive charge (like a firecracker) under the wire. Use a NiCad element to light the fuse.

You could use a knife-switch and a servo.

Since this is to be a "once on always on" device...
You could use a mousetrap as a spring-loaded knife-switch, held open by a bit of fuse wire - blow the fuse and close the switch. (There's a lot you can do with spring-loaded switches.)

But what you do depends on the circumstances.
Sounds like I'll constantly need to replace components which isn't really what I want. I just want the switch to flick when there's a current so that the lamp and the buzzer stay on until someone deals with it.
 
Ah - so you need to be able to switch it off as well.
That's not what "permanent" means.

There are any number of switching circuits ... depends how it is to be triggered.
Something provides a current when the lamp needs to glow? Presumably not enough current to light the lamp by itself - hence the relay.

What's wrong with just using a transistor?
Something more robust: trip a physical switch with a servo or a solenoid.
 
wannab said:
K4pwP67.jpg


I need one small input to switch on a slightly larger circuit permanently, until I cut the power off or until I open the switch. Relays seem a bit expensive and intended for higher voltage applications than I require. Is there a way to swap the relay here with transistors or something?

What is your voltage?
How much current do you want to control?
How much is too expensive?

Could you please explain your symbols?
Is the inductor in the collector line supposed to be the coil of the relay?
If so, what does B represent in the switched circuit?
What does the symbol of the circle with the X in it represent?
Why do you have a resistor in the emitter line and what is its approximate value?
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
Ah - so you need to be able to switch it off as well.
That's not what "permanent" means.

There are any number of switching circuits ... depends how it is to be triggered.
Something provides a current when the lamp needs to glow? Presumably not enough current to light the lamp by itself - hence the relay.

What's wrong with just using a transistor?
Something more robust: trip a physical switch with a servo or a solenoid.
The problem with a transistor is that it only provides current while it has inputs, afaik you can't arrange them so that an impulse causes a permanent flow of current. Or am I wrong?
 
skeptic2 said:
What is your voltage?
Very small, 6V or something. I haven't bought components yet.
How much current do you want to control?
Not very much. Just enough to light a LED and sound a buzzer.
How much is too expensive?
Well a relay is around £5 on eBay and I thought that was too much. It was also much larger than I expected for such a simple device. If there's a way to do it with transistors that'd be great.

Could you please explain your symbols?
X is a lamp, B is a buzzer.
Is the inductor in the collector line supposed to be the coil of the relay?
Yes.
Why do you have a resistor in the emitter line and what is its approximate value?
I'm not sure if it's completely accurate. I thought if I didn't then it would be a short.
 
There's a 12V and 40amp relay on eBay for £2. Does this only work for around these levels or would a small current and slight smaller voltage work?
 
Here's a chapter about http://openbookproject.net/electricCircuits/Semi/SEMI_7.html with several ways to do what you want.
e.g.

http://openbookproject.net/electricCircuits/Semi/03208.png

http://openbookproject.net/electricCircuits/Semi/03320.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
dlgoff said:
Here's a chapter about http://openbookproject.net/electricCircuits/Semi/SEMI_7.html with several ways to do what you want.
e.g.

http://openbookproject.net/electricCircuits/Semi/03208.png

http://openbookproject.net/electricCircuits/Semi/03320.png
Thanks a lot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11


You're welcome.
 
  • #12


If you decide to go with the SCR circuit which I recommend, I'd also recommend that you put your LED (with the proper current limiting resistor) and the buzzer in parallel. In series, when the buzzer opens, the SCR will turn off.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
992
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K