Stargazing Is there any material I can use for an aperture solar filter?

AI Thread Summary
For safe solar observations without a commercial solar filter, using welder's glass rated at Shade 12 or higher is recommended, as it effectively reduces sunlight intensity. Homemade solutions like covering the telescope's objective with cardboard and multiple layers of a mylar survival blanket can also work, with 3 to 4 layers suggested for optimal viewing. Eyepiece filters are strongly discouraged for solar viewing due to safety concerns. While some suggest using split DVDs as filters, this advice is deemed unsafe. Investing in a proper solar filter or telescope is advised for serious solar observation in the future.
nuffsed
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I live in a small town and would like to make some observations today. However i don't have a solar aperture filter, i only have an eyepiece filter of which i do not trust. So is there any household items, materials i could use safely to save me from from ordering on the net and waiting however for the film to arrive. Someone said DVDs split in in half (1/2 depth/thickness) works but is that good advise or just bad advise?

I should say that the telescope is a D= 76mm( but can be reduced). SO any ideas would be great or am i just hoping for something that does not exist.

Thank you.

P.S
I have no idea what this prefix i need to select is about, i am not at school I am just an enthusiastic beginner of astronomy.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I bought a piece of welder's glass from my local "Princess Auto" (a hardware warehouse).

I covered the scope objective with cardboard, cutting a small hole in it, and then taped the welder's glass over that.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and nuffsed
DaveC426913 said:
I bought a piece of welder's glass from my local "Princess Auto" (a hardware warehouse).

I covered the scope objective with cardboard, cutting a small hole in it, and then taped the welder's glass over that.
NICE ONE! Such a simple idea. It seems quite obvious now you say it. Thank you.
 
nuffsed said:
i only have an eyepiece filter of which i do not trust.

NEVER EVER use an eyepiece filter for solar filtering

nuffsed said:
Someone said DVDs split in in half (1/2 depth/thickness) works but is that good advise or just bad advise?

not good advice

nuffsed said:
I should say that the telescope is a D= 76mm( but can be reduced). SO any ideas would be great or am i just hoping for something that does not exist.

76mm is a good aperture size :smile:
Easiest thing to use is 3 to 4 layers of a mylar survival blanket over the front of the scope
Start with 4 layers, if it is too faint, reduce to 3 layers.
I used film filters for 40+ years for viewing sunspots and solar eclipses

when you get a bit more money (~US$50 - $170) you can get a commercial solar filter
here's the same thing over the front of one of my telephoto lenses …..

2015_03_14_3302sm.jpg


one of several suppliers
http://thousandoaksoptical.com/shop/solar-filters/full-aperture-solarlite/when you get lots of money, you can get a proper solar telescope like this one of mine ……

IMG_1093sm.jpg


Now the mylar and the commercial filter glass ways are great for showing sunspots on the surface of the sun
And a warning, because we are at solar minimum, there are very few spots to be seen. The sun is pretty lank most of the time.

That solar scope of mine shows prominences on the limb and other features on the face of the sun.
It is a very narrow Hydrogen Alpha (Ha) 0.7 Angstrom and less.

with that you get images like this …….

180909 Ha Cap_14.jpg


180930 Cap 003.jpg


180930 Cap 053.jpg

See my solar imaging thread on PF, here ……

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/solar-imaging-and-techniques.925656/cheers
Dave
 

Attachments

  • 2015_03_14_3302sm.jpg
    2015_03_14_3302sm.jpg
    40.3 KB · Views: 457
  • IMG_1093sm.jpg
    IMG_1093sm.jpg
    29 KB · Views: 431
  • 180909 Ha Cap_14.jpg
    180909 Ha Cap_14.jpg
    8.1 KB · Views: 423
  • 180930 Cap 003.jpg
    180930 Cap 003.jpg
    12.4 KB · Views: 457
  • 180930 Cap 053.jpg
    180930 Cap 053.jpg
    50.7 KB · Views: 487
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman, russ_watters and Drakkith
Note that the quote below is for DIRECT viewing, not thru a telescope. If you use full aperture of your 76mm telescope, add 4 to the shade numbers in the article.
Quoted from: https://eclipse2017.nasa.gov/safety

Viewing with Protection -- Experts suggests that one widely available filter for safe solar viewing is welders glass of sufficiently high number. The only ones that are safe for direct viewing of the Sun with your eyes are those of Shade 12 or higher. These are much darker than the filters used for most kinds of welding. If you have an old welder's helmet around the house and are thinking of using it to view the Sun, make sure you know the filter's shade number. If it's less than 12 (and it probably is), don't even think about using it to look at the Sun. Many people find the Sun too bright even in a Shade 12 filter, and some find the Sun too dim in a Shade 14 filter — but Shade 13 filters are uncommon and can be hard to find.

For those interested, the 'add 4 to the shade numbers' was calculated from:
(I'm using 1mm pupil diameter here for a safety factor >2. Online search says minimum diameter is 1.5mm.)
Assume eye pupil diameter of 1mm. Area of 0.785sq.mm.
Telescope aperture 76mm. Area of 4 534sq.mm.
Area ratio: 5776 (That's the additional factor of intensity reduction required.)

Welding filter are rated as Shade Number = log10(attenuation ratio)
log(5776) = 3.76
So add 4 to the shade number and you get 1/10,000 of the light thru.
If you can't find any dark enough you can stack them. The shade numbers add.

Cheers,
Tom
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top