Is There Evidence for the Existence of Torque in a Stationary System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phil7860
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
In a stationary system, the sum of the torques must equal zero to maintain equilibrium. A balanced meter stick serves as a practical demonstration, where placing weights on either end can illustrate this principle. When the stick is perfectly balanced on a fulcrum, it does not rotate, confirming that torques are equal and opposite. Adjusting the weights can show how torque changes, but equilibrium requires that the total torque remains zero. This discussion emphasizes the fundamental concept of torque balance in non-rotating systems.
Phil7860
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Okay, so the problem is pretty simple:

Prove that in a stationary (non-rotating) system, that the sum of the torque equals zero.

My solution is to take a meter stick that's mass is evenly distributed. Find the center of the meter stick, then balance it on a fulcrum point. Since the object is not rotating, the sum of the torques must equal zero.

Move the meter stick to the left or right, and the stick will rotate counter/clockwise.

My question is, would that convince you that the sum of the torque equals zero in a stationary system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
move it so it's off balance then put a light weight on the far, long end; and put a heavier weight on the shorter end wherever appropriate to make the thing balance.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...

Similar threads

Back
Top