Can we use this approximation for k_D<<k_F?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Petar Mali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximation
Petar Mali
Messages
283
Reaction score
0
For k_D&lt;&lt;k_F

|\frac{\hbar^2k^2_F}{2m}-\frac{\hbar^2k^2}{2m}|\approx \frac{\hbar^2k_F}{m}|k_F-k|

Where k goes from k-k_D to k+k_D

k_F - Fermi wave vector
k_D - Debay wave vector
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you mean k goes between k_F+k_D and k_F-k_D?

Yes it is valid. Let's denote k=k_F+\delta k, then

<br /> |\frac{\hbar^2k_F^2}{2m}-\frac{\hbar^2k^2}{2m}|=|\frac{\hbar^2k_F\delta k}{m}+\frac{\hbar^2 \delta k^2}{2m}|<br />

since \delta k&lt;k_D\ll k_F we can neglect the last term (quadratic in \delta k and get

<br /> |\frac{\hbar^2k_F\delta k}{m}|=\frac{\hbar^2k_F}{m}|k_F-k|<br /> [/itex]
 
Thanks a lot! :) Yes from k_F-k_D to k_F+k_D.

I think that you have just a little mistake

You must write like

<br /> <br /> |\frac{\hbar^2k_F^2}{2m}-\frac{\hbar^2k^2}{2m}|=|-\frac{\hbar^2k_F\delta k}{m}-\frac{\hbar^2 \delta k^2}{2m}|<br /> <br />

To get C|k_F-k| or in case you wrote you will get

C|k-k_F|

You helped me a lot!
 
Petar Mali said:
Thanks a lot! :) Yes from k_F-k_D to k_F+k_D.

I think that you have just a little mistake

You must write like

<br /> <br /> |\frac{\hbar^2k_F^2}{2m}-\frac{\hbar^2k^2}{2m}|=|-\frac{\hbar^2k_F\delta k}{m}-\frac{\hbar^2 \delta k^2}{2m}|<br /> <br />

To get C|k_F-k| or in case you wrote you will get

C|k-k_F|

I assumed that |\ldots | meant taking the absolute value. If this is so then overall signs do not matter.

Anyway, You're welcome.
 
Yes! My mistake!
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top