Is this grignard preparation mechanism correct?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanism of a reaction involving magnesium and a carbon-halogen bond. It describes how magnesium transfers an electron to the C-X bond, resulting in the formation of a magnesium radical and a carbon radical after the halogen atom departs with two electrons. The negatively charged bromide ion then forms an ionic bond with the magnesium radical, and the radicals combine to create a new covalent bond. There is a point of contention regarding the representation of the formal charge, with one participant noting that the carbon does not have a formal negative charge due to the electron transfer dynamics. The adequacy of the wording and the mechanism drawing is also questioned, with references to external sources for validation.
Horseb0x
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/6488/mechanisma1.png
The magnesium transfers an electron to the C-X bond, yielding a Mg radical. The halogen atom leaves with 2 electrons from the bond and the carbon is converted into a radical. The negatively charged bromide ion forms an ionic bond with the positively charged Mg radical. The single electrons of the carbon radical and Mg radical are used to form a new covalent bond.

Is this correct? Also is my wording and mechanism drawing adequate?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Horseb0x said:
[PLAIN]http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/6488/mechanisma1.png
The magnesium transfers an electron to the C-X bond, yielding a Mg radical. The halogen atom leaves with 2 electrons from the bond and the carbon is converted into a radical. The negatively charged bromide ion forms an ionic bond with the positively charged Mg radical. The single electrons of the carbon radical and Mg radical are used to form a new covalent bond.
Is this correct? Also is my wording and mechanism drawing adequate?

I don't agree with the formal negative charge you have shown. Remember that it gained 1 electron from Mg and lost one to Br.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top