Is This High School Physics Exam Question Fair?

  • Thread starter Thread starter noodlesofrome
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    High school School
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a high school physics exam question regarding the horizontal force acting on a skier moving at constant velocity. The question is perceived as unfair due to a lack of information about opposing forces like friction and air resistance. Initially, the correct answer was believed to be unclear, but it was later clarified that the coefficient of kinetic friction for waxed skis is provided in a reference sheet. The participant realized they had been using the wrong reference tables, which contributed to their confusion. The conversation highlights the importance of having complete information in physics problems for fair assessment.
noodlesofrome
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
hi I am new here, but I signed up to ask this question. I was looking at a high school physics exam from last june and one of the questions seems to me like it's unfair. I think they didn't give enough information to solve the problem. here it is;

An 80-kilogram skier slides on waxed skis along a
horizontal surface of snow at constant velocity
while pushing with his poles. What is the horizontal
component of the force pushing him
forward?

(1) 0.05 N
(2) 0.4 N
(3) 40 N
(4) 4 N

The correct answer is supposedly #3, but I am really unsure why. The problem and the supplied formula tables made no mention to air resistance or friction forces that oppose his forward momentum. If the skier is already at a constant velocity and we neglect any opposing forces, we shouldn't need to apply any extra forces to keep him moving. Am I mistaken?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right, the problem seems to be missing some data. Since he's pushing with his poles, friction must be acting. (I presume that no data about the coefficient of friction was given?)
 
It turns out that on the official Regents reference sheet, the coefficient of kinetic friction for a waxed ski on snow is given as 0.05.
 
wow that was fast. thanks for your reply.

If that is the case, then I did overlook that. However I looked at the reference sheet again and I don't see it. this is the link for the pdf

http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/osa/reftable/reftablearch/physicstbl.pdf"

do you have something different?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
<---- feels kinda dumb

Thanks for your replies doc. I did have the wrong reference tables. I would not have noticed until now.

here is the correct link
http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/osa/reftable/reftablearch/physics06tbl.pdf

you are awsome :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top