Is This Sequence Compact? Analysis of {1, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 4/5...}

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compact Set
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


{1,1/2,2/3,3/4,4/5...} is this set compact.

The Attempt at a Solution


I think this set is compact because it contains its cluster point which is 1.
is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is correct.
 
You could prove that by appealing to "any closed and bounded subset of the real numbers is compact" or directly from the definition:
Let \{U_\alpha\}, for \alphain some index set, be an open cover for this set. Since 1 is in the set, 1 is in at least one of those- relabel the sets, if necessary, so that set is called U_1. Since U_1 is open, there exist a point p, in that set, and a number \delta> 0 such that N_\delta(p)= \{x | |x- p|<\delta\} is in U_1. It then follows that if n> 1/\delta |1- (n-1)/n|= 1/n< \delta so that all except a finite number of the fractions in the sequence are in U_1. Every number in the sequence, (n-1)/n for n less than that might be in as separate set in the original sequence but there are only a finite number of them.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top