Is This the Correct Balanced Equation for Producing Bleach?

  • Thread starter Thread starter coolnufc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct balanced chemical equation for producing bleach through the reaction of chlorine gas with sodium hydroxide. The proposed equation is Cl2 + 2NaOH -> NaCl + NaClO + H2O. Participants are asked to verify the accuracy of this equation. The equation appears to be correct as it balances the reactants and products appropriately. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate chemical equations in understanding the production of bleach.
coolnufc
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Could anyone help me with this, i have an answer but I am sure its not right.

Bleach is an aqueous solution of sodium chloride and sodium chlorate(l), NaClO, in a 1:1 ratio. It is produced by dissolving chlorine gas in cold dilute aqueous sodium hydroxide.

a) write a balanced equation for the reaction of chlorine with sodium hydroxide to form bleach.

Ive got:
Cl2 + 2NaOH -> NaCl + NaClO + H20.

anyone check this for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top