Is this the Maximum Power Generated from a Small Hydro Plant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vee9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum power output of a small hydro plant using a nearby river's flow. The river's dimensions and flow rate yield a volume of 6 m³/s, translating to a mass of 6000 kg/s. The potential energy at the top of the waterfall is calculated as 588,000 J/s, while the kinetic energy adds another 6,750 J/s, totaling 594,750 J/s. Assuming a conservative system, the energy at the bottom equals the energy at the top, leading to a calculated power output of 148,687.5 W when accounting for the turbine's 25% efficiency. The user seeks confirmation on the accuracy of these calculations.
Vee9
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A small hydro plant is being built. A nearby river is 4m wide and 1m deep. The water flow is 1.5m/s over the brink of a 10m high waterfall. The turbine company advertises 25% efficiency in converting the potential energy of the water into electric energy. What's the power you can generate?

Homework Equations



Ug = mgh
K= 0.5mv2


The Attempt at a Solution



Waterfall.jpg


Since V = 1.5 m/s, I found the volume of water passing over the brink of the waterfall, every second:
Volume/ sec = LWH = 1.5(4)(1) = 6m3/ sec

Convert to mass:
1m3 = 1000 kg
6m3 = 6000 kg

Since I did the beginning calculations for "every second", I wrote the rest of the values as "per second" too

At the top of the waterfall, there is grav.potential and kinetic energy:
Ug = mgh = 6000(9.8)(10) = 588 000 J / s
AND
K = 0.5mv2 = 0.5(6000)(1.5)2 = 6750 J/s
SO
Etop = 6750 + 588 000 = 594 750 J/s


I'm not sure if it is right to assume that this system is conservative because there's a lot of friction in flowing water, but I did anyway...
At the bottom of the waterfall, there is kinetic energy. Assuming a conservative system:
Ebottom = Etop
Ebottom = 594 750 J/s

% efficiency is 25%, so:
25% of 594 750 = 148687.5 J/s = 148687.5 W = POWER
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just need someone to check the answers because I don't know if they're right.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top